Effect of Lymphocyte Phenotypic Alterations on the Humoral Response to Vaccination Against SARS-COV-2 in Dialysis Patients.

Background: The response to vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) varies depending on comorbidities. This study evaluated the clinical and immunological factors affecting the humoral response of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) to the BNT162b2 vaccine. Methods: Humoral immunity was evaluated in 54 ESRD patients using serum levels of anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) and neutralizing antibodies (NAbs), measured by a chemiluminescent immunoassay 30 (T1), 60 (T2), and 120 (T3) days after the second vaccine dose. The results were correlated to baseline patient T- and B-lymphocyte subpopulations determined by flow cytometry. Results: The proportion of seroconverted patients based on the NAb titer decreased from 83.3% at T1 to 53.7% at T3. Age was negatively correlated to the NAb titer at T1 and T2. Patients receiving hemodiafiltration had higher NAb titers at T3. Diabetes was associated with a lower response rate at T3. Univariate analysis revealed a positive correlation between the naïve CD4 T-lymphocyte population and RBD titer at T1 and the NAb titer at T3, with no association observed with naïve CD8 T lymphocytes. NAb titers at T3 were significantly correlated with late-differentiated CD4 T lymphocytes and terminally differentiated effector memory cells re-expressing CD45RA (TEMRA) CD8 T lymphocytes. RBD levels were positively correlated with naïve and memory B-lymphocyte counts at T3. Conclusions: Age, diabetes, and hemodialysis prescription had significant impacts on the response to vaccination. T- and B-lymphocyte phenotypes are major determinants of the humoral response potency to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with BNT162b2 in patients with ESRD.

Prospective Analysis of B Lymphocyte Subtypes, before and after Initiation of Dialysis, in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease.

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is followed by alterations in adaptive immunity. The aim of this study was to evaluate B lymphocyte subtypes in ESRD patients before and after hemodialysis (HD) or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: CD5, CD27, BAFF, IgM and annexin were evaluated by flow cytometry on CD19+ cells in ESRD patients (n = 40), at time of initiating HD or CAPD (T0) and 6 months later (T6). RESULTS: A significant reduction in ESRD-T0 compared to controls was noticed for CD19+, 70.8 (46.5) vs. 171 (249), p < 0.0001, CD19+CD5-, 68.6 (43) vs. 168.9 (106), p < 0.0001, CD19+CD27-, 31.2 (22.1) vs. 59.7 (88.4), p < 0.0001, CD19+CD27+, 42.1 (63.6) vs. 84.3 (78.1), p = 0.002, CD19+BAFF+, 59.7 (37.8) vs. 127.9 (123.7), p < 0.0001 and CD19+IgM+ cells, 48.9 (42.8) vs. 112.5 (81.7) (K/µL), p < 0.0001. The ratio of early/late apoptotic B lymphocytes was reduced (16.8 (10.9) vs. 110 (25.4), p = 0.03). CD19+CD5+ cells were the only cell type with an increased proportion in ESRD-T0 patients (2.7 (3.7) vs. 0.6 (1.1), p < 0.0001). After 6 months on CAPD or HD, CD19+CD27-(%) and early apoptotic lymphocytes were reduced further. The HD patients also showed a significant increase in late apoptotic lymphocytes, from 1.2 (5.7) to 4.2 (7.2) K/mL, p = 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: B cells and most of their subtypes were significantly reduced in ESRD-T0 patients compared to controls, the only exception being CD19+CD5+ cells. Apoptotic changes were prominent in ESRD-T0 patients and were exacerbated by HD.